Tue, Dec
49 New Articles

Serbia’s Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Overview

Serbia’s Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Overview

  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Intellectual property infringement through the circulation and sale of counterfeit goods is still very much both a global and a local issue. As modern day counterfeiting is now acquiring more sophisticated forms involving a plethora of new and usually unsuspected goods (for example, pharmaceuticals) and with the intent of not only existing on the black markets but infiltrating into the legal market flows as well, we are faced with the need for a more aggressive approach requiring first and foremost improved legislation and subsequently more efficient enforcement activities. 

Serbia’s eagerness to improve IPR enforcement, not only as one of the prerequisites on the path to European integration but also, simply, because intellectual property protection is very much a necessity in this modern day and age, is best reflected through the gearing up of the harmonization process of the country’s IP legislation with that of acquis communautaire. As a case in point, Serbia’s intellectual property-related legislation is, now, almost fully compliant with that of the EU except for a few minor tweaks still to be made with regards to – in-particular – copyright protection.

Setting up a strong legislative framework also serves as a stepping stone towards more efficient enforcement of intellectual property rights, ultimately allowing for greater awareness of the importance of the lawful use of intellectual property rights and a concurrent improvement of the local economy through the increase of workflow and filling up of state coffers. 

The implementation of a strong legislative framework with speedy and positive enforcement outcomes would have remained only semi-successful, however, without constant monitoring of EU and regional best practices and their introduction into the local environment, thus allowing for improved protection and a steady decrease in piracy rates.

Additionally, improving protection through a more decisive and goal-oriented approach from the business community on the one hand and the state and judiciary on the other has led to the current state of affairs, in which pre-enforcement activities involving (for instance) brand owners and their initiatives against counterfeiting and piracy have become just important as the enforcement activities by the state bodies.

As a result, we have come to witness significantly improved cooperation and more transparent communication between the business community and relevant state bodies, with law firms acting as intermediaries. 

On the official state level, the Government of the Republic of Serbia also recognized the need for more efficiency and transparency and thus undertook several steps to facilitate more fluid communication between inter-state bodies tasked with IPR protection. Since in Serbia, as in many other countries, there is a number of state bodies tasked with protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights, the responsibilities and tasks of these bodies often overlap – hence the necessity for facilitating more efficient cooperation between them, to allow for a more transparent and efficient protection of said rights. In wanting to achieve these results, the Government focused part of its efforts in 2014 on setting up a formal coordination body consisting of a work group to raise awareness on the importance of protecting intellectual property rights, another to gather and compile statistical data on intellectual property rights infringement cases, and another to develop the national strategy for further improvement of said rights. 

This more vigorous approach towards combatting modern day IPR infringement cases requires more expeditious rulings, and thus has also seeded the ground for the semi-specialization of courts consisting of panels of judges specialized in intellectual property rights protection.

In the recent amendments to Serbia’s Law on Court Organization and Law on Seats and Territories of Courts and Public Prosecutors two courts have been singled out to deal with intellectual property-related infringements involving both natural and legal persons. Significantly, this two-point contact existing through the Commercial Court in Belgrade and the Higher Court in Belgrade resulted in a decrease in the deferrals of IPR-related cases and in the unnecessary prolongations of already-lengthy judicial proceedings.

Of course, as elsewhere, although legislation and enforcement are at satisfying levels, improvements will always need to be made – if only because new “counterfeit trends” are knocking at our doors at this very moment.

By Dragomir Kojic, Partner, and Tamara Bubalo, Associate, Karanovic & Nikolic

This Article was originally published in Issue 4.5 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

Serbia Knowledge Partner

Committed to redefining a law firm's role in an emerging regional market, Gecić Law is a full-service law firm that advises international and local clients from the public and private sectors in navigating the complex legal landscape of the region across multiple practice areas. Members of the Gecić Law team have graduated from leading universities in the US and Europe. They have extensive local and international experience, with a particular focus on EU regulatory frameworks and international trade and a proven track record in providing innovative and practical solutions in the most complex of matters.

Gecić Law is an exclusive member of two leading global alliances, TerraLex and TAGLaw, extending its international footprint. The firm and its lawyers have continuously been recognized in several practice areas by elite global directories, including The Legal 500, Chambers and Partners and Benchmark Litigation. Gecić Law was named Law Firm of the Year: South Eastern Europe 2021 and Law Firm of the Year: Eastern Europe and the Balkans 2020 at The Lawyer European Awards and was repeatedly nominated in other practice areas.

For more details, please visit geciclaw.com.


Our Latest Issue