12
Sat, Jul
62 New Articles

Court of Justice Decides in Favour of Hungarian Taxpayers in Landmark Bad Debt Relief Case

Court of Justice Decides in Favour of Hungarian Taxpayers in Landmark Bad Debt Relief Case

Hungary
Tools
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) established that for bad debt relief limitation period must begin to run not from the date of performance of the payment obligation initially provided for, but from the date on which the debt became definitively irrecoverable.

Recovery of VAT on bad debts has been on the agenda in Hungary since the Court of Justice of the European Union first clarified in the di Maura case at the end of 2017 and then in the Hungarian Porr case in 2019 that EU Member States need to provide for VAT recovery already paid on such claims. In several cases the Hungarian tax authority refused to refund the VAT on bad debts, since based on the general limitation period rule of 5 years, the limitation period from the original date of performance had expired.

In the current case - C‑507/20 – the Hungarian tax authority once again challenged the applicant taxpayer’s claim for reimbursement, since the limitation period expired since the original dates of performances in 2010 and 2011, respectively. The applicant, however, argued that debtor company was subject to winding up proceedings, and the liquidator recorded that the debt had become irrecoverable only in December 2019.  The applicant filed for reimbursement, in accordance with the Hungarian provisions on bad debt relief, once the irrevocability of the debt had been established officially.

Further to the request for preliminary ruling by the Hungarian Court, CJEU clearly established in its ruling of 3 March 2021 that the applicant has acted diligently and that it cannot be deprived of its right to a reduction of the taxable amount. It also follows that, in accordance with the existing case law in this regard, the limitation period for recovery of VAT on bad debts should only start from the date on which the debt became definitively irrecoverable.

This decision, alongside with a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Hungary on bad debt relief, should provide key precedent and clear interpretation in many similar cases where the Hungarian tax authority unlawfully limited the right of reduction and reimbursement of taxpayers regarding the previously duly paid VAT on bad debts.

By Balint Zsoldos, Head of Tax, KCG Partners Law Firm

Hungary Knowledge Partner

DLA Piper is a global law firm with lawyers located in more than 40 countries throughout the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. This positions us to help clients with their legal needs around the world.

With more than 60 lawyers, including 14 partners, and a staff of over 140, DLA Piper Hungary is one of the largest international law firms operating in Hungary. What makes us stand out is that we offer not only legal services but also tax and business advisory support in a fully integrated manner. We maximize synergies between legal, tax, and business advisory services to offer a unique service for our clients, particularly in regulated industries such as energy, infrastructure, life sciences, banking, and telecommunications.

We are a true full-service firm, providing our private and public sector clients with advice on all aspects of their business. This includes transaction-related advice, people and employment, commercial dealings, litigation, information technology, media and communications, intellectual property, insurance, tax, real estate, and restructuring plans.

DLA Piper Hungary has received numerous professional awards and is consistently ranked among the top law firms in Hungary by international rankings. We are ranked #1 by Mergermarket among the law firms active in Hungary based on the volume of M&A deals handled between 2005 and 2024.

Firm's website.

Our Latest Issue