07
Tue, Apr
68 New Articles

Four Years With a New Civil Code – Where Are We Now?

Four Years With a New Civil Code – Where Are We Now?

Czech Republic
Tools
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

It has been more than four years since new legislation revolutionizing Czech private law came into effect, mainly through the adoption of a new Civil Code. Among the most affected industries was real estate, traditionally a very strong investment sector on the Czech market. How has life been since this revolution?

Good Faith as a Condition

The flagship of the new regulation was the strengthening of good faith in the registration status in the Real Estate Register, and the resulting increase in certainty within legal dealings. Thus, whoever is registered in the Real Estate Register as the owner or beneficiary of a certain right is regarded as the rightful owner or beneficiary of that right, provided the right was acquired in good faith and for consideration. With that, acquisition from a non-owner became possible.

This principle has been welcomed,by buyers and investors. Of course, registration status may not always reflect actual ownership status. Owners therefore must pay more attention to the status of registration in the Real Estate Register and dispute any wrongful registration by filing a law suit and ensuring entry of a dispute note within the time periods set by the Civil Code, which can be up to three years. As a result, due diligence has changed in scope significantly, and it is not rare for buyers, banks, or investors to rely only on the information registered in the Real Estate Register, or to instruct their lawyers to examine acquisition titles going back only three years, instead of the previously-standard examination period of ten years.

New Real Estate Instruments

The new Civil Code has also brought back the principle that the building forms part of the land (superficies solo cedit), thus uniting the previously impractically divided ownership of the building and the land. Shortly after the new law came into force, the Real Estate Register carried out a convenient automatic unification of land plots and buildings in the ownership of one and the same owners where such unification was possible (e.g., when no right in rem registered to the land or building prevented the unification). Where the ownership can not be unified because there are different owners of the land and building, a preemption right between the owners exists. 

Together with the unification of ownership, a new right in rem – the right of construction – has been introduced, allowing non-owners of land to build and place a building on foreign land on the basis of another legal title, along with lease or easement. Despite the right of construction being restricted in its duration to 99 years and being established on the basis of an agreement with subsequent registration in the Real Estate Register, it has been taken into account by banks and investors and included in the finance structures of transactions. Other newly introduced instruments – including the negative pledge and the prohibition on transference and encumbrance having effects towards third parties – have also been welcomed and used widely, especially by banks or private investors, allowing for better structuring and securing of the financing despite the nature of the instruments not being a security in the strictly legal sense of the word (i.e. having an accessory relation to the secured debt).

Good Acceptance on the Market

The market has responded positively to the new legislation. Owners, asset managers, investors, and banks have welcomed the new instruments, which enable them to better react to the specifics of each transaction. We now have more tools to manage, secure, and in general make better use of real estate. As a result, we have greater freedom – but also more responsibility – when structuring a project or a transaction, regardless of its size. 

Naturally, the lack of case law relating to the new instruments prevents us from predicting with certainty how these instruments will be interpreted by the courts. When we hear talk of the future, we mostly hear that technology will dominate every possible area of life. Therefore, it may be that due diligence or valuations of real estate will be carried out by robots, and that transfer and construction agreements will be drafted by automated software. Regardless of how judges’ opinions and artificial intelligence shape the future, real estate will remain what it has always been – a solid, palpable asset worthy of being legally right and well secured.

By Erwin Hanslik, Managing Partner, Ivana Menhartova, Senior Associate, Taylor Wessing Prague

This Article was originally published in Issue 5.6 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

Czech Republic Knowledge Partner

JŠK, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o. (JŠK) is a medium-sized law firm based in Prague providing a comprehensive range of commercial legal advisory services in the Czech Republic. Our team consists of almost 30 lawyers, five of whom are partners with many years of experience from leading international law firms. We advise local and international clients from banking, insurance and various industry sectors, boast a respected projects practice, and work for the public sector at the federal and municipal level.

Ever since it was founded in 2004, JŠK has striven for the epitome of professionalism, expertise and ethical integrity. We continuously seek to surpass what large global law firms can offer and to give our clients a personal approach. All mandates are equally important to us regardless of size as we guide clients through both complex and seemingly routine matters.

Our clients turn to us for advice when implementing their business plans across all areas of commercial law. We are proud members of PONTES: the CEE lawyers, a unique network of law firms through which we provide services not only in the Czech Republic but also in Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia.

Firm's website: http://www.jsk.cz

Our Latest Issue