02
Tue, Mar
83 New Articles

Romania’s Implementation of the EU’s Fourth Money Laundering Directive

Romania’s Implementation of the EU’s Fourth Money Laundering Directive

Romania
Tools
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

The implementation of the EU’s fourth money laundering directive (2015/849/EU, or MLD4) is a subject of significant interest in Romania, as the process of adopting a new Money Laundering Bill (MLB) in line with the provisions of the MLD4 to replace the current Money Laundering Act is in full progress.

As currently constituted, the MLB will require companies and other legal entities incorporated within Romania’s territory to obtain and hold adequate, accurate, and current information on their beneficial ownership, including details of the beneficial interests – the “reporting entities” – they hold. The MLB is expected to obtain the necessary support to be approved by the Parliament. 

As MLD4 does not require the information to be publicly available, in Romania, all the information gathered by the reporting entities according to the MLB must be kept in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) and the Data Protection Act no. 667/2001, and only disclosed to specified authorities. 

Mention should be made that, in terms of the MLB, the “beneficial owner” is any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the entity and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted, either directly or indirectly. Also, the legal definition of the “beneficial owner” includes a list of categories of individuals that ultimately may control a legal entity.

In this respect, the actual form of the MLB provides that the reporting entities shall have a number of obligations, including to: (i) report suspicious transactions, as well as transactions that do not present the usual suspicion indicators, but are made in cash and with a value of at least the RON equivalent of 15,000 EUR; (ii) provide information regarding the beneficial owners, defined by the law as “any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the entity and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted, directly or indirectly”; (iii) effect customer due diligence, either simplified, standard, or extended; (iv) preserve relevant reporting documents; and (v) effect a risk assessment regarding the exposure of their activity to money laundering and terrorism financing, considering the main risk factors such as clients, country, geographical area, products, services, transactions, or distribution channels. 

In addition, the MLB contains several obligations related to personnel, such as the requirement that a person be designated with responsibilities related to the enforcement of the MLB, and the requirement that a periodic training of employees be conducted with respect to the provisions of the MLB.

Considering its novelty, it is anticipated that the obligation to provide information regarding the beneficial owners shall have the greatest impact on companies. As a consequence, it is important to note that the obligation applies to “corporate and other legal entities,” such as trusts, associations, and foundations, as well as other legal entities that administrate and distribute funds.  

Nonetheless, the MLB sets out several specific obligations, which have the nature of transitory provisions of the law, such as filing a declaration regarding the beneficial owner in the Registry of Beneficial Owners. Personal information must be provided regarding the beneficiary as well as the manner in which it exerts control over the entity. 

Failure to comply with this obligation, if not corrected after being noted by the competent authority, shall result in the dissolution of the legal entity. 

Another important issue to consider is that, once the MLB enters into force, companies will be prohibited from issuing bearer bonds, and all existing bearer bonds shall be converted into nominative bonds. Failure to fulfil this obligation within the provided term will result in the dissolution of the entity.   

Finally, it should be noted that infringement of the MLB’s provisions may entail civil, disciplinary, contraventional, administrative, and/or criminal liability.

By Adrian Chirvase, Partner, Popescu & Asociatii

This Article was originally published in Issue 6.5 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

Popescu & Asociatii at a Glance

Popescu & Asociatii is a top Romanian business law firm founded to provide premium integrated services to premium businesses, both in Romania and abroad, in all the relevant areas of practice, and especially in all industries of interest for active economic players.
Established as a full-service law firm, Popescu & Asociatii genuinely combines the expertise and exposure in the consultancy field with high level of strategic capabilities and experience in trials and court rooms, to provide state-of-art advice and representation both in local and cross border deals and files. The firm acts for corporation, local companies, banks and financial corporations, as well as for investment funds and entrepreneurs in all the areas of law: Banking and Finance, Capital Markets, Corporate and Commercial/Mergers and Acquisitions, Competition and Antitrust, Dispute Resolution, Employment, Compensations and Benefits, Energy and Natural Resources, Environment, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Intellectual Property and GDPR, IT, Telecom & Media, Infrastructure, PPP and Public Procurement, Prevention, Compliance and White-Collar Crime, Real Estate and Construction, Restructuring and Insolvency, Transport Law.
Our mission is to deliver strategic, excellent and innovative legal and business solutions. Excellence, collaboration, and innovation are at the core of the way we work, with each other and with our clients. We focus on building long-term relationships and we do this by staying true to our founding principles: to provide client service and the highest standards, always keeping in mind work ethics, integrity and the responsibility towards our clients businesses, deals and cases that they entrusting us.
Popescu & Asociatii is ranked and recognized among outstanding law firms in Romania by IFLR 1000 Financial and Corporate and Benchmark Litigation Europe Edition. In addition, the firm received Best Litigation Law Firm in Romania award and has been recognized as one of the best White-Collar Crime Romanian law firms, based on our outstanding experience and market recognition in Romania, at the Romanian Legal Annual Awards Gala 2019.

More information about Popescu & Asociatii can be found here.